Search results for "critical%20code%20studies%20working%20group"

Results 821 - 830 of 1097 Page 83 of 110
Sorted by: Relevance | Sort by: Date Results per-page: 10 | 20 | 50 | All

Alex Link

[…]and “The Mysteries of Postmodernism, or, Fredric Jameson’s Gothic Plots” in Gothic […]

Penny Florence

[…]A central issue for me is: what could digital forms reveal about poetic language that conventional critical writing cannot?  To explore this, in the late 90s, I began to experiment with “Un coup de dés jamais n’abolira le hazard,” the Mallarmé poem often cited as the forerunner to concrete and modern visual poetry. Simply put, it seemed to me proto-digital more than proto-concrete. It became an interactive CD-Rom (sounds quaint now!) containing translations and critical interventions impossible on paper, but seemingly implicit.  Since then, I’ve focused on the Readers Project (with John Cayley and Daniel Howe), making poems embodying elements […]

Amaranth Borsuk

[…]that ask students to consider not only what they write, but how. She is currently at work on a critical book, “The Upright Script: Modernist Mediations and Contemporary Data […]

Kathi Inman Berens

2014-2015 Fulbright Scholar at the University of Bergen’s Digital Culture Research Group, Kathi Inman Berens works with canon formation and reception history of electronic literature. A curator and scholar, Kathi has installed literary exhibits and live performances at the Library of Congress, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and at two annual conventions at the Modern Language Association. Her shows have been reviewed in academic journals and the Huffington Post. A lecturer at the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School of Communication, and member of the Annenberg Innovation Lab’s Research Council, Kathi won in 2012 an IBM Faculty Award for her work […]

Jason Lajoie

[…]He is also the Podcast Section Head for First Person Scholar, uWaterloo’s multimedia games studies periodical run through its Games […]

A Place For Human Hands On the Keyboard

[…]being variable, and visible according to different organizational rubrics: theme, language group, discourse style, real world geography, “Joe’s Favorites,” “Users’ Favorites.” Many different ways to view the Table of Contents, or Field of Contents. Different views for different uses, different moods. 3} — Many programmers have made it a Holy Grail to devise a nest of algorithms to…automatically…link new pieces of designwriting together in a meaningful way. The results are sometimes interesting, but most often dull. My counsel: try that, if it interests you, but don’t leave ALL the linking functions to the machine. Have machine-linked views AND Human-DJ-Linked views. […]

The Body Sings

[…]Laurie Becklund (HBJ 1991) wears out its claim as Nike’s unauthorized biography by being less critical of the sneaker giant than Just Do It manages to be. Take away the feud between CEO Phil Knight and J.B.’s husband Rob, who left the company in 1986, and Swoosh is no more unauthorized than a pledge raid on the frat house. two tales of one Nike Author, authorized, unauthorized, authority, authoritarian: terms laid waste by postmodern discourse attain recuperation in the business world of letters. Some of the respectable journalists I name may resent being identified as authors of authorized corporate histories, […]

Everyone An Artist?

[…]though (and I’m having trouble coming up with ways to talk about this without sounding critical, which I really don’t feel). You are proposing that questions will be posted that aren’t too restrictive and that will stimulate response by anyone, right? How will these responses differ from a listserv (other than that they will be more permanent and will interlace with one another through the warp and woof of the linkages)? Will all writing on the web become the expression of a moment rather than the production of contemplation inspired by the desire to speak about something? Is writing about […]

How Are We Going To Kill Information?

Hello, everybody– As probably the most troglodytic of the group (or certainly bottom ranked), I find myself grouping the questions raised into crude categories, two of which (opposed) I just want to briefly mention. The first is form, and I am tremendously excited by the careful thought and attention I find here towards the notion of “emergence.” This is a great experiment somewhere between trad. categories of communication and collaboration that will no doubt dwarf my already humbled imagination. The other question I don’t think I’ve seen directly mentioned (although indirectly in several of Anne’s points): the question of death. […]

scholarship with attitude

[…]experimental writing; scholarship with attitude – work that requires readers to bring to it more critical vocabulary and theoretic understanding than is required by magazines for a more general audience, and yet is way cooler than the kind of academic writing that appears in most journals. A hip academic journal, is one early oxymoron model, as I recall. Right now, so much of ebr fits this (even if that isn’t the primary goal of the piece). I would hate to see this fall by the way side and become an elaborate listserve, or what may amount to the same thing, […]