Search results for "C_THR86_2305 Latest Study Guide 📟 Reliable C_THR86_2305 Test Sample ⌛ C_THR86_2305 Braindumps 🥈 Open [ www.pdfvce.com ] and search for [ C_THR86_2305 ] to download exam materials for free 🤲Test C_THR86_2305 Lab Questions"
| Results 731 - 740 of 1053
|
Page 74 of 106
|
|
Sorted by: Relevance | Sort by: Date
|
Results per-page: 10 | 20 | 50 | All
|
[…]and the cognitive sciences intersect (and also how to recognize the much larger area of motor and perceptual concerns where the two fields have nothing at all in common). Consenstein, like Cochran, sees literature as emerging (like consciousness) from material and structural constraints. That places literature in a place where its continued development in electronic environments might be conceivable (as a response to new constraints, not as a practice subordinated to gadgets and gizmos, or the romance of embodiment). DeLillo, Don. Cosmopolis. New York: Scribner, 2003. The longue durée in a stretch Limo. Traveling across lower Manhatten, the 28-year-old multi-billionaire […]
[…]beginning of the article, the authors provide a summary description of the “heterotic” string: [T]he heterotic string is constructed as a combination of the right-moving coordinates of the ten-dimensional superstring and the left-moving coordinates of the 26-dimensional bosonic string. This yields a theory which is Lorentz invariant in D = 10 and which has appealing features not found in either theory separately. […] Thus the name ‘heterotic.’ (254-5) A theory that is “Lorentz invariant” is one that is consistent with special relativity, a pre-condition for any realistic physical theory. This particular version of the string is “super-” because the model […]
[…]or skin, as a productive (poetic) layering of bodily markings and remarkings. In line with the latest turn on McLuhan’s theory, the RFC defines the message through an impossible and disappearing mixture of command and communication. Boundaries fold and collapse and the whole is tethered to the inchoate interior of bodies. Documents like this are a hidden poetics, and the source of “the becoming literary of the literal” in electronic literature. Works Cited “About the Electronic Literature Organization.” The Electronic Literature Organization. Accessed July 31, 2009. Borenstein, N, and N. Freed. “MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions): Mechanisms for Specifying and […]
[…]Neo-Liberalism, Corporate Capitalism, Managerial Capitalism, Late Capitalism, or just Capitalism. And to name the system is also, correlatively, to name the method specifically designed for its critique: Marxism which, according to Fredric Jameson, constitutes that “untranscendable horizon that subsumes such apparently antagonistic or incommensurable critical operations, assigning them an undoubted sectoral validity within itself” (The Political Unconscious 10). That Lennon can perpetually gesture toward, but never fully settle on, either of these terms is, of course, a crucial symptom of the very crisis he so ruthlessly anatomizes as well as a rhetorical marker of the anti-institutional mood that deprecates not […]
[…]Luntz puts it, channeling Stanley Fish: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People Hear). L. “[G.], far from accepting that Chomsky has any place on the left at all, near or far, banishes him unceremoniously to the right” (6,869) G. I must apologize if the book gives this impression; I fully accept the overt left-anarchist-libertarianism of Chomsky’s political work, and try to point at this at least obliquely, e.g., “while Chomsky’s real-world politics are widely understood to be radically left, his institutional politics are often described exactly as authoritarian” (33); it is Chomsky qua linguist whom I am trying […]
[…]Zizek pointed out in his discussion of Rumsfeld’s press conference statement: What [Rumsfeld] forgot to add was the crucial fourth term: the “unknown knowns,” the things we don’t know that we know – which is precisely, the Freudian unconscious, the “knowledge which doesn’t know itself,” as Lacan used to say . . . If Rumsfeld thinks that the main dangers in the confrontation with Iraq were the “unknown unknowns,” that is, the threats from Saddam whose nature we cannot even suspect, then the Abu Ghraib scandal shows that the main dangers lie in the “unknown knowns” – the disavowed beliefs, […]
[…]Derrida’s “The Autobiographical Animal,” Wolfe powerfully expresses his book’s thesis: “[W]e” are not “we”…. Rather, “we” are always radically other, already in- or ahuman in our very being – not just in the evolutionary, biological, and zoological fact of our physical vulnerability and mortality, our mammalian existence but also in our subjection to and constitution in the materiality and technicity of a language that is always on the scene before we are, as a precondition of our subjectivity. Not only does Wolfe’s statement memorably describe, in his view, the current attitude about posthumanism, it makes a point highly relevant to […]
[…]fictional art critic Madame Realism observes in The Madame Realism Complex (1992), “[S]tories do not occur outside thought. Stories, in fact, are contained within thought. It’s only a story really should read, it’s a way to think.” Madame Realism aptly summarizes Tillman’s cognitive aesthetic, which posits literary writing as a way of thinking through imperceptible conflicts. And though this process involves making critical judgments, literary adjudicating entails more than conscious ratiocination – more than predominantly logical operations occurring in the mind. Tillman regards storytelling, indeed all modes of intellection, as a thoroughly embodied activity in which meaningful comprehension results from complex, […]
[…]perspective reveals deeper continuities within his oeuvre, and charts not a departure, but the latest stage in DeLillo’s consistent neural investigations. DeLillo’s fascination with cognition extends back to the early seventies, but Point Omega refines this general interest by directing attention toward the eye as a site of selective input into what he called, in Ratner’s Star (1976), “the layered brain.” Point Omega‘s first sentence ends with the word “visible,” and this word introduces the drama of sight that makes up most of the novel. In place of the escalations and conflicts that fill most fictions, DeLillo builds his book […]
[…]as a place of other lives and actions and possibilities, ignore experience itself. We have heretofore counteracted or countervalenced gravity, understanding between the lower and upper surfaces of an airfoil’s plane like two parts of a fraction the differential lift that makes us air-borne, and inventing sealed submersibles with compressed air to insulate ourselves and erase our prohibitive air-water barrier. But in drilling into the earth beyond the ancient coastlines, we have summoned our own carelessness and precipitated from below the explosive complexities in the Earth not directly visible at least to the naked eye of geology and gain, and […]