Search results for "C_THR86_2305 Latest Study Guide 📟 Reliable C_THR86_2305 Test Sample ⌛ C_THR86_2305 Braindumps 🥈 Open [ www.pdfvce.com ] and search for [ C_THR86_2305 ] to download exam materials for free 🤲Test C_THR86_2305 Lab Questions"
| Results 751 - 760 of 1053
|
Page 76 of 106
|
|
Sorted by: Relevance | Sort by: Date
|
Results per-page: 10 | 20 | 50 | All
|
[…]of an open gap in being. It is not yet mourning. It is traumatic in advance, marking a trauma to come, in the sense that trauma is dream, is something displaced in experience and time. The phenomenology of the gap is tied to the time of waiting and not to any other perception. Duration, waiting, vigilance: these may be bodily relations beyond alterity … Alan Yes, again, and the waiting for the observer is also tied to the possibility of recovery; for the person in pain, it is timeless, and I’d think even the potential of temporality or a temporal horizon is absent. Sandy Is it not […]
[…]Marked as irrational—the covert sphere as dreamworld—this zone is also paradoxically open: “[t]he secret is that there is no secret—or […] that the most important secrets are public secrets” (22). Such statements further emphasize the impossibility to set up simple partitions between open and closed, or public and covert, systems while they further gesture towards the larger, disturbing matters that arise in states whose ostensible survival depends on black ops and juridically exceptional orders. To cite Agamben: “the clean opposition of democracy and dictatorship is misleading for any analysis of the governmental paradigms dominant today” (2005: 48). That is, then, […]
[…]on Gaddis’ fiction by emphasizing its traditional and innovative aspects” (3) establishes this latest collection, curiously, as a kind of link between the two earlier books. True to the editors’ vision, the essays in ‘The Last of Something’ are wide-ranging, revisiting familiar themes in Gaddis criticism as well breaking new critical ground. The “traditional” side of Gaddis criticism manifests itself in several ways throughout these essays, though not in a reductive or categorical way. Some of the traditionalists attack what they perceive to be the art of critical excess in Gaddis criticism. Essays by Crystal Alberts, Joseph Conway, and Birger […]
[…]can be killed without a second thought. And certainly without legal consequence. Cary Wolfe’s latest book, Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame, takes up the legal issues that inform our relationships with non-human animals, most pointedly, how the law determines which animals deserve protection. For other ebr essays by Wolfe, click here. There is, as Wolfe instructs us, a double meaning of “before the law” that does violence to animals such as rabbits. First, there is the “originary violence” as the law “installs its frame for who’s in and who’s out.” Second, there is “the violence of sacrifice for […]
[…]texts, which, though they refer beyond themselves to a larger stream of lifework, have an identity and compelling delight, per se. These types of creative forces, embodied for the moment in a person and his (in these cases) struggle, bring the raw together with the highly sophisticated, resulting in that person’s highly idiolectical understanding of systems and an iconoclastic process of dismantling them from the inside out, “burrowing” through them, to use Deleuze and Guattari’s term for how a “minor” literature constructs itself through, around, within and under a majority language. In spite / or because/ of the “high coefficient […]
[…]between his print and electronic work. In “The Persistence of the Ordinary” he describes “[t]he call for attention to the ordinary”: In theorizing and creating early hypertexts many of us saw a form suited to reifying and retrieving the cyclic richness of ordinary life…. What none of us—modernist, Marxist, postmodernist, feminist, hypertextualiste—could quite anticipate was the current regime of repeated and insistent novelties. (Moral Tales 137) In contrast to the way that “[t]he net dislodges the quotidian and diurnal” Joyce offers literature: “The fundamental familiarity of literature is its sense of life lived in common and commonplace” (137). In this […]
[…]to William Gaddis, Richard Powers, Mark Danielewski, and Don DeLillo in the case of Taylor; to Toni Morrison, Thomas Pynchon, and Cormac McCarthy in the case of Hungerford and McClure. The appeal of such studies at the beginning of the twenty-first century can in part be attributed to a more widely shared post-9/11 interest in fundamentalism within American culture at large. This is most obviously the case with McClure, who seeks to distinguish the “partial faiths” of postmodern authors from fundamentalist discourse. As he sees it, “postsecular narratives affirm the urgent need for a turn toward the religious even as […]
[…]in Morgantown on June 20th to June 23rd. The contributors were organized by Stephanie Strickland to offer suggestions on how to improve the organization as it attempts to re-define its mission in a shifting cultural, economic, and technological landscape. Ranging from the concrete to the poetic to the theoretical, the following nine short statements were made by a group of emerging artists, scholars, and practitioners from a variety of disciplines and backgrounds. My association with the ELO began when I was an art student, progressed through my time in graduate school, and now I come to it as what I […]
[…]of the ELO, many of us are operating with current generation computing technology (e.g., the latest laptops, iPads, etc), whereas schools that are fortunate enough to have computing resources might be operating on equipment that is years out of date. As an organization, the ELO might develop classroom guides and materials for teachers addressing concrete ways to nurture reading, writing, and thinking alongside computer literacy skills. Just as importantly, we might provide some of our prior generation technology to underserved schools, perhaps around the Boston area, where the ELO is based. Other ways I envision the ELO addressing social justice […]
[…]moments in the history of John Simon’s Every Icon can be calculated with Every Icon Editor. [1] The first icon ever, 1024 white squares, appeared only for an instant on January 27, 1997 at 9:42:30. [2] After that, each individual icon represents a hundredth of a second since Simon’s project was launched, including the precise moment Every Icon Editor was first compiled on February 25, 2014 at approximately 15:41:30. [3] Some edited icons are scheduled for enumeration only after the sun expands then collapses into an earth-sized diamond approximately 4-5 billion years from the present. [4] The ultimate icon, with which […]