Search results for "C_THR86_2305 Latest Study Guide 📟 Reliable C_THR86_2305 Test Sample ⌛ C_THR86_2305 Braindumps 🥈 Open [ www.pdfvce.com ] and search for [ C_THR86_2305 ] to download exam materials for free 🤲Test C_THR86_2305 Lab Questions"
| Results 21 - 30 of 1053
|
Page 3 of 106
|
|
Sorted by: Relevance | Sort by: Date
|
Results per-page: 10 | 20 | 50 | All
|
[…]Co-Evolution of Humans and Tools Simondon distinguishes between a technical object and a [mere] tool by noting that technical objects are always embedded within larger networks of technical ensembles, including geographic, social, technological, political and economic forces. For my part, I find it difficult to imagine a tool, however humble, that does not have this characteristic. Accordingly, I depart from Simondon by considering tools as part of technics, and indeed an especially important category because of their capacity for catalyzing exponential change. Anthropologists usefully define a tool as an artifact used to make other artifacts. The definition makes clear that […]
[…]works of digital literature: “Electronic literature, whatever it might become, is not just the latest area of academic specialization. Rather, it seems that we are involved, collectively, in transforming how literary work is performed, presented, and represented in multiple media” (Tabbi, 2002). Through works of digital literature, what we are able to witness is not so much the incarnation of a pre- existing literariness, but rather a metamorphosis of literariness. The path taken is one of historical construction and variation of literariness. Those who criticize such texts for their lack of literary value have perhaps failed to grasp that which […]
[…]use large impersonal systems as a staging ground for “intimate bureaucracies,” which “make[] poetic use of the trappings of large bureaucratic systems and procedures (e.g., logos, stamps) to create intimate aesthetic situations, including the pleasures of sharing a specific knowledge or a new language among a small network of participants” (xii). Saper stresses that rather than creating avant-garde art forms that are completely divorced from the everyday experience of life in postindustrial cultures, networked art tends to practice the idea that “the only way out is through” (16). This idea is predicated on an acceptance of the technical noise inevitably […]
[…]this transformation has centered upon the research function of the universities. But it has now [!] shifted to the instructional function.” In his extremely persuasive discussion of the relationship between correpondence schools at the turn of the last century and distance education, Noble associates the correspondence movement with the emegence of a “casualized workforce of `readers’ who worked part-time and were paid on a piece-work basis per lesson or exam (roughly twenty cents per lesson in the 1920s). Many firms preferred `sub-professional’ personnel, particularly untrained older women, for routine grading. These people often worked under sweatshop conditions, having to deliver […]
[…]political identity, economic agency, cultural structure, theological meaning will they have? [For Mark Amerika in Notes from the Digital Overground, “Being Digital is Being Networked and Being Networked is the most efficient and clever way of Being Marketed” -eds.] They might represent monstrous beings living on the margins, surviving at the edge, adapting to the infrastructures inside and outside of material and virtual reality. With digital gills and analog lungs, virtual fins and material legs, these amphibious agencies now are rapidly coevolving with humanity. Will they reproduce as separate species? Or will even more fascinating hybrids emerge as telepresent human […]
[…]Publishers. “We are forward-looking in an activity plainly our culture is leaving behind …. [I]n the position of salvaging, of casting backward, of recovery, of withstanding erosion.” We may have reached a moment in cultural history where a certain type of looking backward has become inseparable from and as revolutionary as so-called looking forward. Evening Gass & Afternoon Nambi “You first meet a painting like a pie in the face.” William Gass is well into the first evening’s reading of an essay that sometimes seems like a story, or a story that sometimes seems like an essay, or perhaps just […]
[…]is concerned with a “material mark” in the poem’s final lines that “sometimes appear[s] like this”: laughing, in the mechanism. . “The final dot,” Kirschenbaum notes, “is not a typo, nor is it an act of authorial punctuation.” The dot was “most likely used in early electronic mail software to transmit the ASCII version of the poem” (231). To separate an operative signal from noise is not only the goal of information science but also, Kirschenbaum reminds us, the foundation of modern bibliographic studies in its concern with the transmission of literary texts. Kirschenbaum cites essentially all modern textual scholars […]
[…]sheathed with information – ads, news, stock tickers running almost too fast for the eye to comprehend. Packer’s stretch limo, with its TV monitors and communication devices, is an island of information. People enter the limo to give him bursts of information – his chief of technology, his currency analyst, a doctor, his chief of finance, and his theorist. Perhaps echoing Tom Wolfe’s “masters of the universe” in Bonfire of the Vanities, Packer is a master of systems of information who wants to turn his body into pure information. Second, the city as nomadic space. Packer has a 48-room apartment […]
[…]project to a new place? David Shorter describes a moment in his project’s development: After my latest meeting this morning I actually feel like, in some ways [the Vectors tech team] broke the DaVinci code, and this might actually be a very workable model within a week, which is crazy to think about. In intellectual labor we think a project – writing and editing – could take a long time. But in a programmer’s world I have a feeling that once they break a code or learn how to hack something (which I think they just did) it makes everything, […]
[…]of their metanarratives of legitimation” that now compels certain parts of the humanities “[to] turn toward the science” as Gary Hall suggests in his contribution to the first installment (134). This turn, Hall insinuates, is an attempt by humanists “to increase their connection to society and to instrumentality and functionality” (134). The fundament for this new connection, the mode of this “outreach” is building, not destruction, as Cathy Davidson and David Theo Goldberg famously point out in their 2004 paper Engaging the Humanities: “What part of our inability to command attention is rooted in humanists’ touting of critique rather than […]