Search results for "C_THR86_2305 Latest Study Guide 📟 Reliable C_THR86_2305 Test Sample ⌛ C_THR86_2305 Braindumps 🥈 Open [ www.pdfvce.com ] and search for [ C_THR86_2305 ] to download exam materials for free 🤲Test C_THR86_2305 Lab Questions"
| Results 301 - 310 of 1053
|
Page 31 of 106
|
|
Sorted by: Relevance | Sort by: Date
|
Results per-page: 10 | 20 | 50 | All
|
[…]of inflecting acts of signification (although necessarily in a meaningful way). We all know, for example, what is suggested by algorithmic “blurring” as applied to an image, including the image of a word — it doesn’t change the word, it “softens” it, or whatever.Of course, in discussions of rhetoric there is explicit appreciation of language tropes similar to “blurring,” for example. In fact, my “or whatever” here is a minute but effective blurring filter. With text, there is as yet no accepted repertoire of algorithmic manipulations from, for example, letter to word to line. An important task for writing in […]
[…]the verb “navigate” comes from the combination of words navis (ship) and agere (to guide). Thus, in the current case of the navigation of a large, public, information space — like a large archive of Usenet newsgroups — the “ship” has been replaced by a self, and so the point of navigation is self-guidance or self-governance. From this perspective, the right to way to evaluate or critique a browser — or any other piece of navigation software — is with respect to how well it supports self-governance. In the particular case of a VLSC browser it should help us better […]
[…]where we could be heading. “Ordinary” technical work is often also based on dreams; ubiquitous computing dreams of physical objects interconnected and alive with information, distributed computing dreams of the ability to seamlessly interact from any location. These dreams are often, in contrast to the social-utopian direction in which Sack leans, dreams of efficiency, control, and marketability. But, I would argue, the more fundamental difference is that “uncritical” technical dreams are usually not open to questioning within the technical discourse. They are proffered as a motivation — that which lies behind and breathes life into the real work of algorithms […]
[…]their presence in products is a (not quite arbitrary) sampling mechanism, and enables us to compare very different products. So their secondary function, the concern of this essay, is as a simple instrument to slice through the history of our attempts to swap attributes with machines and be able to understand the nuances of complex sociotechnical systems — precisely because the systems are rendered in the form in which we can best recognize nuance: English, be it our own or the machines’. These chips represent in-the-wild models of the interactions between humans and machines — as reductive as they are […]
[…]in language as her body came and went through time and distance… A poetic method which had heretofore been based on waiting for insight, suddenly had to accommodate process, an indeterminate physics, a philosophy that combined spiritual searching with detached looking. (246-247) Blending scholarship and personal narrative, Hillman goes on to thoughtfully explore the spaces where one can locate meaning in physics and Christian mysticism. Like Hillman, many of the volume’s contributors find and generate traditions in departure from the unified first person – no surprise, as linearities and egocentricities are gendered to the male and are, regardless of gender, […]
[…]the United States should practice torture, but that torture should be outsourced. “We cannot [torture suspected terrorists] so let’s give them back to Pakistan. They will do it.” Again, although people accuse me of being some arrogant Hegelian, Leninist, I’ll admit – very honestly, that I don’t have answers. At this state of the revolutionary process [chuckling] I see my function as introducing more trouble, if anything, to force confrontations. As a friend put it, the standard Leftist stance is that we basically know what’s going on, and we just need to find a way to mobilize people. I don’t […]
[…]integrity. Fuller’s book relentlessly interrogates this power in an effort to undermine it, to examine the unreflective beliefs that we have about computers and to anchor our political action in awareness. Industries configure traditional software toward the ends of commerce and therefore its very form manipulates the user and transforms him into an unknowing consumer, the consequences of which are not inconsiderable. Throughout his book, Fuller voices concern over and contempt for the corporatization of Internet development. Fuller sees a shift from open, collaborative software development (“to build a system that works”) to closed industry consortia whose corporate members are […]
[…]the more familiar physicality of the world as the abiding energy of stories, the results lead to forms of literature and experiences of reading that dramatically disrupt one’s dreary illusions about identity and time and thrillingly transform one’s sense of reality back into that something which it is at all times: quandary, transformation, and self-invention. We see noesis as central to fictions such as Poe’s story, “The Man of the Crowd,” in Kafka’s The Castle, in Melville’s astonishing “Bartleby the Scrivener,” in Henry James’ “In the Cage” and Faulkner’s Pylon, and in postwar literature, through the French nouveau roman as […]
[…]of religious fundamentalism (sound familiar?). Aspiring jihadists work as electrical engineers and computer technicians and they consume the most violent, metaphorical passages in the Koran as if they are operational directives from military HQ. And so then it’s not surprising when Ruthven tells us, almost in passing, that Ramzi Yousef, who coordinated the 1993 World Trade Center attack reportedly met Oklahoma-city bomber Terry Nichols in the Philippines for a bizarre non-denominational bomb-makers’ tete-a-tete. Adding a fascinating narrative of anthropology to all this psychopathology, Ruthven explains how the arcane Arabian economies of tribal ownership, plunder, and patronage combine with Wahhabi and […]
[…]and denied its generic status (respectively, cf. LeClair’s introduction to the 1987 edition [v], and Hadas), and only in the 1990s did references to the cyborg begin to appear (Tabbi 145). In general, analyzing such a struggle for legitimacy would lead a long way into both aesthetic and institutional issues, in which old-fashioned standards of timelessness are still applied by commentators who regard with suspicion the use of metaphors whose “technological” or “scientific” signifiers (whether coming from “hard” or “soft” sciences) are hopelessly bound to historical contingency, haunted by the specter of a readership not necessarily coinciding with the “distinction” […]