Search results for "C_THR86_2305 Latest Study Guide 📟 Reliable C_THR86_2305 Test Sample ⌛ C_THR86_2305 Braindumps 🥈 Open [ www.pdfvce.com ] and search for [ C_THR86_2305 ] to download exam materials for free 🤲Test C_THR86_2305 Lab Questions"
| Results 441 - 450 of 1053
|
Page 45 of 106
|
|
Sorted by: Relevance | Sort by: Date
|
Results per-page: 10 | 20 | 50 | All
|
[…]health care, and a deeply instrumentalized education. Only from this focus on the biopolitical and laboring body, and “the systematic suffering built into” the lifeways of the cyborg, does Haraway build out a subsequent vision of political articulation through differences (one that has much in common with the democratic practice of hegemony theorized by Laclau and Mouffe), toward the possibilities of movement-building that Haraway terms “the informatics of resistance.” Observing the informatic logic of increasing linguistic standardization on the Internet, David Golumbia pursues the skeptical tradition of Haraway’s work by observing the pre-eminence of English in the medium (of the […]
[…]of this stripe often saw themselves within the Marxist tradition and Marx was always careful to examine the ways social innovations worked both in the direction of supporting existing institutions and in challenging, indeed even undermining them. Surely no starry-eyed idealist, Marx was ever vigilant for tendencies (in technology, in social organization, even in law and intellectual life) that resisted absorption within the existing power structure. He even went so far as to lend a kind of support to noxious happenings, such as the destruction of the Indian cotton industry, because they furthered the historical possibilities of socialism. The suspiciousness […]
[…]in the realm of culture, sheltered from any link to capital or class” and thus “reiterate[s] a cultural logic that has been one of capitalism’s most potent ideological forms” (83). My work in the electronic classroom has tried to avoid the kind of cultural studies that Hennessy describes, even if many of her charges apply to dominant trends within electronic pedagogy. To use the Web and hypertext as sites of resistance, I believe, necessitates a critical look at the field of computers and writing. Most discussions of cyberpedagogy are not only celebratory; they also naively replicate the logic of contemporary […]
[…]private communication: some include “pointers to my friends” or “pointers to my kids”…. [and some] take the form of clever personal narratives. Richard Furuta and Catherine C. Marshall, “Genre as Reflection of Technology in the World-Wide Web” On the screen we follow the link to what were once in Troubadour tradition called Vidas and Razos, which are the life and reason (origin and purpose) of the poems bound in (I really do urge you) with the poet’s art – though what it serves to know this history who can say. The new barbarians who, for instance, populate alt.hypertext complain constantly […]
[…]or less the same amount of interaction (i.e., next to none at all). (An exception would be Eco’s latest work “Encyclomedia,” but this one deserves separate consideration in another essay.) Off the mainstream, the situation looks more promising. The publisher of “Elettrolibri” is now going to put on the market a second original hypertext, “Ustica War Zone” by Giles Wright, a novel and essay on the 1982 mystery downing of a DC-9 above the Ustica island, Italy. The title, which was repeatedly delayed because of new findings in the still-open investigation, has gathered some interest and should also become a […]
[…](I throw in this last clause,”with every chance we get,” as a concession to Stanley Fish’s latest salvo against the idea of the public intellectual, in Professional Correctness, because I agree with Fish – hence my critique of Jacoby, Dickstein et al. – that our “extra-academic” engagements are not simply a matter of voluntarism. I know perfectly well how difficult it is to crack the pages of mass-circulation magazines, never mind CNN). Now that I’ve sketched out my major disagreement with Getting the Dirt, the question remains, embedded somewhere in the preceding paragraph: what does this disagreement have to do […]
[…]to the public; additional discussion groups occur after particular performances. For The Tempest, for example, Carey invited Stephen Greenblatt (Berkeley) and Harry Berger (Santa Cruz) to speak; for Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia, Katherine Hayles (UCLA) addressed the issue of chaos theory and narrative structure; for Euripides’ Hecuba, the symposium included law professor Jeremy Waldron (Bowlt), classicist Helena Foley (Barnard), and the anthropologist Martin Bernal (Cornell). And so on. I myself am shortly going to be on a panel discussing “language” theatre with poet-dramatist-novelist Mac Wellman and poet-dramatist-publisher Douglas Messerli, in conjunction with the production of Eric Overmyer’s delicious parody of film […]
[…](generating behavior based on rules) and participatory (allowing the player as well as creator to move things around). This makes for a lot of gaming. Secondly, it is a medium that includes still images, moving images, text, audio, three-dimensional, navigable space — more of the building blocks of storytelling than any single medium has ever offered us. So gamemakers can include more of these elements in the game world. Furthermore, games and stories have in common two important structures, and so resemble one another whenever they emphasize these structures. The first structure is the contest, the meeting of opponents in […]
[…]book. Quite the contrary – the eros in this passage lies not in the sailor’s fucking of woman and toy, but in the writer’s seduction of the reader. Acker is playful, coy, teasing – surprising and tantalizing us with rapidly shifting perspectives. She is a selfish, demanding mistress: she never lets her monstrous sackcloth characters upstage her erotic tropes, never lets us forget we are immersed in Writing, immersed in Her. This is a model I try to live up to in my own work. Though I’m constantly writing about sex, increasingly what I’m interested in is not sex, but […]
[…]yet there is still a danger that you will reencounter organizations that restratify [everting] formations that restore power to a signifier, attributions that reconstitute a subject – anything you like, from Oedipal resurgences to fascist concretions. Groups and individuals contain microfascisms just waiting to crystalize (9-10). For Deleuze and Guattari, the answer to domination by rigid calcification and binary determinism in the trajectories of symbols, as well as in the behavior of human beings, lies in the in-difference of emergent aggregative forms as they interpenetrate yet remain beyond the grasp of those crystalline structures within and without the single cognizing […]