Search results for "C_THR86_2305 Latest Study Guide 📟 Reliable C_THR86_2305 Test Sample ⌛ C_THR86_2305 Braindumps 🥈 Open [ www.pdfvce.com ] and search for [ C_THR86_2305 ] to download exam materials for free 🤲Test C_THR86_2305 Lab Questions"
| Results 451 - 460 of 1079
|
Page 46 of 108
|
|
Sorted by: Relevance | Sort by: Date
|
Results per-page: 10 | 20 | 50 | All
|
[…]health care, and a deeply instrumentalized education. Only from this focus on the biopolitical and laboring body, and “the systematic suffering built into” the lifeways of the cyborg, does Haraway build out a subsequent vision of political articulation through differences (one that has much in common with the democratic practice of hegemony theorized by Laclau and Mouffe), toward the possibilities of movement-building that Haraway terms “the informatics of resistance.” Observing the informatic logic of increasing linguistic standardization on the Internet, David Golumbia pursues the skeptical tradition of Haraway’s work by observing the pre-eminence of English in the medium (of the […]
[…]of this stripe often saw themselves within the Marxist tradition and Marx was always careful to examine the ways social innovations worked both in the direction of supporting existing institutions and in challenging, indeed even undermining them. Surely no starry-eyed idealist, Marx was ever vigilant for tendencies (in technology, in social organization, even in law and intellectual life) that resisted absorption within the existing power structure. He even went so far as to lend a kind of support to noxious happenings, such as the destruction of the Indian cotton industry, because they furthered the historical possibilities of socialism. The suspiciousness […]
[…]awareness of the positions within capitalism that college students currently occupy and needs to foreground these elements within the course itself. Students are caught up in the intensified squeeze on public services (including the tightening of budgets for public education), the increased downsizing and outsourcing, the global restructuring that involves the relocation of labor to the South and to the East, and the continually rising rates of unemployment. College students are positioned as both commodities and consumers. Universities increasingly view students as “inputs” and as “products” in an overtly corporatized model of how institutions of higher learning should function (Rhoades […]
[…]people are. One of those Librarians, who lives in Columbus Ohio, posted telling us all about her latest work. She had gotten the Alphabet tattooed across her back. Twice. Upper and Lower cases. The font was Bryn Mawr. She even typed up a sketch of what it looked like. I thought that was SO cool. Not at all the common small-flash-picked-off-the-wall-and-put-some-place-easy-to-hide. I wrote her some Email telling her how impressed I was, and asking her about some of her feelings about her new ink. You can read the rest of the story if you care to (it gives away nothing […]
[…]or less the same amount of interaction (i.e., next to none at all). (An exception would be Eco’s latest work “Encyclomedia,” but this one deserves separate consideration in another essay.) Off the mainstream, the situation looks more promising. The publisher of “Elettrolibri” is now going to put on the market a second original hypertext, “Ustica War Zone” by Giles Wright, a novel and essay on the 1982 mystery downing of a DC-9 above the Ustica island, Italy. The title, which was repeatedly delayed because of new findings in the still-open investigation, has gathered some interest and should also become a […]
[…](I throw in this last clause,”with every chance we get,” as a concession to Stanley Fish’s latest salvo against the idea of the public intellectual, in Professional Correctness, because I agree with Fish – hence my critique of Jacoby, Dickstein et al. – that our “extra-academic” engagements are not simply a matter of voluntarism. I know perfectly well how difficult it is to crack the pages of mass-circulation magazines, never mind CNN). Now that I’ve sketched out my major disagreement with Getting the Dirt, the question remains, embedded somewhere in the preceding paragraph: what does this disagreement have to do […]
[…]to the public; additional discussion groups occur after particular performances. For The Tempest, for example, Carey invited Stephen Greenblatt (Berkeley) and Harry Berger (Santa Cruz) to speak; for Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia, Katherine Hayles (UCLA) addressed the issue of chaos theory and narrative structure; for Euripides’ Hecuba, the symposium included law professor Jeremy Waldron (Bowlt), classicist Helena Foley (Barnard), and the anthropologist Martin Bernal (Cornell). And so on. I myself am shortly going to be on a panel discussing “language” theatre with poet-dramatist-novelist Mac Wellman and poet-dramatist-publisher Douglas Messerli, in conjunction with the production of Eric Overmyer’s delicious parody of film […]
[…](generating behavior based on rules) and participatory (allowing the player as well as creator to move things around). This makes for a lot of gaming. Secondly, it is a medium that includes still images, moving images, text, audio, three-dimensional, navigable space — more of the building blocks of storytelling than any single medium has ever offered us. So gamemakers can include more of these elements in the game world. Furthermore, games and stories have in common two important structures, and so resemble one another whenever they emphasize these structures. The first structure is the contest, the meeting of opponents in […]
[…]book. Quite the contrary – the eros in this passage lies not in the sailor’s fucking of woman and toy, but in the writer’s seduction of the reader. Acker is playful, coy, teasing – surprising and tantalizing us with rapidly shifting perspectives. She is a selfish, demanding mistress: she never lets her monstrous sackcloth characters upstage her erotic tropes, never lets us forget we are immersed in Writing, immersed in Her. This is a model I try to live up to in my own work. Though I’m constantly writing about sex, increasingly what I’m interested in is not sex, but […]
[…]disciplinary boundaries: in each case a network gives rise to new properties, and the ability to formalize and replicate artificially those properties, observed in a large variety of physical and cognitive phenomena, represents a fundamental shift in the understanding of the functioning of systems generally speaking. But what makes this shift from the computational model to the emergent properties model interesting is its ideological as well as epistemological significance. Let us borrow from Varela, Thompson, and Rosch once again as they explain simply, in terms of three questions, the distinction between these two paradigms. The Computational Paradigm: Question 1: What […]